Leaked documents reveal the Trump administration’s unprecedented plan to deport migrants not only to Latin America but also to African and Eastern European nations, raising alarms among human rights advocates over the targeting of vulnerable populations and the disregard for international protections.

Related:

Trump Defends Deportations Without Migrants’ Due Process of Law Rights

The Trump administration’s aggressive immigration agenda has escalated, with internal documents exposing secret negotiations to deport migrants to distant African and Eastern European countries-many with notorious records of human rights abuses and no ties to the deportees. This move expands on previous policies that already sent hundreds of migrants to Central America, now threatening to send thousands more to nations with little capacity or willingness to protect their rights.

The administration’s plan, revealed through internal memos, involves striking deals with countries such as Angola, Equatorial Guinea, Libya, Rwanda, and Moldova to accept migrants who are not their citizens and have no consular support or linguistic connection to these nations. Critics highlight that these countries often lack basic protections for migrants, raising the risk of abuse, detention, or forced disappearance.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Olivier Nduhungirehe, has confirmed that Rwanda is engaged in early-stage discussions with the United States regarding the potential relocation of migrants currently residing in America.@KabagambeI @Kagamelegacy
Ese watanze Like 🎊🇷🇼 pic.twitter.com/i5kdHx59OM

— KAGAME legacy 🇷🇼 (@Kagamelegacy) May 5, 2025

Human Rights at Risk: Deportees Sent to Danger

Human rights organizations and immigrant advocacy groups warn that deporting migrants to nations with poor human rights records constitutes a clear violation of international law. “These transfers put lives at risk and flout basic legal protections,” said Vanessa Cárdenas of America’s Voice, emphasizing that the policy is designed to instill fear and deter migration rather than address root causes or ensure safety.

The Trump administration has justified these measures by labeling certain migrants as “undesirable,” often citing alleged links to criminal groups without due process or evidence. In practice, however, the policy sweeps up asylum seekers, families, and individuals fleeing violence, as well as those with no criminal record. The expansion of expedited removal and the use of mass detention camps have drawn comparisons to the darkest chapters of U.S. immigration history.

Recent court rulings have temporarily blocked some transfers, requiring risk assessments and guarantees for deportees. Nonetheless, the administration continues to seek ways to bypass these protections, including the use of military authority and the construction of large detention camps. Legal experts and immigrant advocates argue that these actions erode the United States’ commitment to asylum and international refugee conventions.

Ultimately, advocates argue that the Trump administration’s deportation plan is less about security and more about sending a message. “This is about deterrence through cruelty,” said Andrew Selee of the Migration Policy Institute, noting that the threat of being sent thousands of kilometers away is meant to frighten would-be migrants and demonstrate the administration’s resolve, regardless of humanitarian consequences.

IN THIS ARTICLE